|
Post by account_disabled on Dec 4, 2023 2:58:27 GMT -8
At the time of issuing the judgment, Mrs. Karolina was in the notice period the employment relationship was still in force and the court ruled that the notice was ineffective. The basis for both claims - reinstatement and recognition of the ineffectiveness of the notice - is Art. ยง of the Labor Code. Remuneration for time out of work after being reinstated to work An employee who has been reinstated to work is entitled to remuneration for the period of being out of work. It amounts to no more than the equivalent of months' salary, and if the notice period was months - no more than month. The exception are pregnant women or people on maternity leave - they areperiod of unemployment photo editing servies Article of the Labor Code . Example Mr. Emil, who worked as an electrician for years, received a notice period from his employer to terminate his contract. The notice period - applicable to employees employed for more than months and less than years - is month. As a result of a lawsuit filed with the labor court. Mr. Emil was reinstated to work, and the court ordered the employer to pay remuneration in the amount of one month's salary. Example Mrs. Ania worked as an usher at a cinema for years. The employer gave her notice of termination of the contract with a period of months for persons employed for more than years . If the labor court decides to reinstate Ms. Ania to work, it will order the employer to pay her the equivalent of one month's salary.
|
|